Traditional IRAs

Individuals who are not active participants in an employer pension plan may make deductible contributions to an IRA. The annual deductible contribution limit for an IRA for 2010 is $5,000. For 2010, a $1,000 “catch-up” contribution is allowed for taxpayers age 50 or older by the close of the taxable year, making the total limit $6,000 for these individuals. For 2010, the AGI phase-out range for deductibility of IRA contributions is between $56,000 and $66,000 of modified AGI for single persons (including heads of households), and between $89,000 and $109,000 of modified AGI for married filing jointly. Above these ranges, no deduction is allowed.

Spousal IRA

If an individual files a joint return and has less compensation than his or her spouse, the IRA contribution is limited to the lesser of $5,000 for 2010 plus age 50 catch-up contributions, or the total compensation of both spouses reduced by the other spouse’s IRA contributions (traditional and Roth).

Roth IRA

This type of IRA permits nondeductible contributions of up to $5,000 a year. Earnings grow tax-free, and distributions are tax-free provided no distributions are made until more than five years after the first contribution and the individual has reached age 59¹/₂. Distributions may be made earlier on account of the individual’s disability or death. The maximum contribution is phased out in 2010 for persons with an AGI above certain amounts–$167,000 to $177,000 for married filing jointly.

Roth IRA Conversion Rule

If you have funds in a traditional IRA (including SEPs and SIMPLE IRAs), §401(a) qualified retirement plan, §403(b) tax-sheltered annuity or §457 government plan, it may be advantageous to consider rolling a portion of such into a Roth IRA this year.  A rollover is treated as a taxable distribution, hence, you will pay tax on the amount converted.  However, depending on your current age and projected AGI for 2010, a Roth conversion may provide you significant tax savings.

Beginning in 2010, taxpayers are able to make Roth IRA conversions without regard to their AGI. If you convert to a Roth IRA in 2010, you have the option of spreading the income ratably over two taxable years (2011 and 2012). This opportunity is available only for conversions in 2010. For conversions in 2011, the tax will have to be paid in the year of conversion.

401(k) Contribution

The §401(k) elective deferral limit is $16,500 for 2010. If your §401(k) plan has been amended to allow for catch-up contributions for 2010 and you will be 50 years old by December 31, 2010, you may contribute an additional $5,500 to your §401(k) account, for a total maximum contribution of $22,000 ($16,500 in regular contributions plus $5,500 in catch-up contributions).

SIMPLE Plan Contribution

The SIMPLE plan deferral limit is $11,500 for 2010. If your SIMPLE plan has been amended to allow for catch-up contributions for 2010 and you will be 50 years old by December 31, 2010, you may contribute an additional $2,500.

Catch-Up Contributions for Other Plans

If you will be 50 years old by December 31, 2010, you may contribute an additional $5,500 to your §403(b) plan, SEP or eligible §457 government plan.

Maximize Retirement Savings

In many cases, you are required to set your 2011 retirement contribution levels before January 2011. You may want to increase your contribution to lower your AGI in order to take advantage of some of the tax breaks described above or to avoid future tax rate increases. Maximizing your contribution is generally a good investment move and can provide an array of tax saving opportunities.

Need Help?

If you have further questions or concerns as you make plans to maximize your retirement investment, give our office a call.  We are currently offering complimentary phone consultations for issues concerning retirement investments.

Please note, I try to avoid asserting political opinions into my website, thus, I present the information below solely to increase awareness of the current tax issues at the state level.  However, I welcome comments that would encourage a healthy discussion thereof.

FLORIDA STATEWIDE TAX ISSUES

Amendment 1 on the statewide ballot would repeal taxpayer financing of statewide political campaigns.

Amendment 2 on the statewide ballot would give active duty members of the U.S. military and Florida National Guard deployed outside the continental U.S., Alaska, or Hawaii a property tax exemption.

Amendment 4 on the statewide ballot would require the utilization of taxpayer-funded elections to make actual changes to pre-approved comprehensive land use plans.

Amendment 8 on the statewide ballot would repeal a constitutional class size mandate in public schools.

Referendum 1 on the statewide ballot would ask Congress to add an amendment to the U.S. Constitution requiring a balanced federal budget.

tax bracket Long-term capital gains rate by tax year 2007 2008, 2009 and 2010 2011 10 percent 5 percent 0 percent 10 percent 15 percent 5 percent 0 percent 10 percent 25, 28 and 35 percent 15 percent 15 percent 20 percent ]]> http://taxattorneyflorida.com/2010-capital-gain-rates-take-advantage-of-the-lower-rates/feed/ 1 http://taxattorneyflorida.com/irs-incorrectly-records-purchase-dates-for-taxpayers-claiming-firsttime-homebuyer-credit/ http://taxattorneyflorida.com/irs-incorrectly-records-purchase-dates-for-taxpayers-claiming-firsttime-homebuyer-credit/#comments Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:07:40 +0000 Sarah E. Martello http://taxattorneyflorida.com/?p=208 Those of you lucky enough to take advantage of the First-Time Hombuyer Tax Credit might be getting a not-so-lucky tax assessment.  Somehow the IRS managed to record the wrong purchase date for 73,000+ homebuyers cashing in on the credit.

This IRS screw-up could be costly for the unfortunate taxpayers affected.  When the First-Time Homebuyer’s Tax Credit appeared in 2008, it was structured as 15-year, no interest loan, with the 1st of the 15 installments due at the time of filing the taxpayer’s 2010 tax return.  The Credit in 2009 and 2010, however, does not require repayment unless either the home is sold within 36 months of the purchase date or the home ceases to be the taxpayer’s primary residence.

The problem arises if the IRS recorded a 2008 purchase date for a home purchased in 2009 or 2010.   Accordingly, the IRS will be trying to collect the first installment payment by April 15, 2011 from the 2008 first-time homebuyers–including those with an improper 2008 purchase date.

Finally, here’s a few pointers for those of you who took advantage of the Credit in 2009 or 2010 and receive a deficiency notice from the IRS:

1. Don’t freak out!
2. Contact the IRS immediately.
3. Find out where the tax assessment is coming from (i.e. your 2007 1040).
4. Be prepared to dig up your closing documents to correct the recording date.
5. If you cannot resolve the issue by following the above steps, you may need to contact a tax attorney.

However, I found the article below interesting not only because it challenges the typical arguments against the estate tax, but because it was written by someone whose inheritance was actually diminished by the estate tax.

Tax Mickey's Estate...but don't take away his Magic Kingdom!

USA Today op-ed, Mickey Mouse, the Estate Tax and Me, by Abigail Disney:

[T]he estate tax will automatically be reinstated after a year’s hiatus — in its 2001 form. … In a far stricter tax environment, my grandfather still managed to accumulate and pass on ample funds to make three subsequent generations very comfortable indeed. And as an inheritor I am here to tell you, the estate tax is not as much of a bogeyman as you’ve been led to believe. Let’s start with the facts:

• First, the estate tax is not a double tax. … People like me, who inherit assets such as Disney stock, can spend our lives watching those assets grow, and when we pass them along to our children, they have not been touched or diminished at all by the tax system. The only thing I have paid taxes on is the interest from these assets, not their increased value.
• Second, opponents of the estate tax claim family farms will have to be broken up to pay the tax, but good luck finding an example of this. …
• Third, the estate tax incentivizes people like me to do good with our wealth because there is no estate tax on donations to charity. My filmmaking and foundations rely on a tax code that supports a vigorous non-profit sector, a vital part of our society that is bigger and stronger because of the many millions of dollars that flow into it as a result of the estate tax and other tax provisions.

To those who believe the estate tax is unfair, I say that there is no tax more fair than this one. I recently signed the Call to Preserve the Estate Tax organized by United for a Fair Economy because the estate tax is an expression of our deepest American values: that we live in a meritocracy, not an aristocracy; that every generation is a fresh start; and that we choose to build a society in which wealth and opportunity do not accrue to people simply for being born wealthy. …

The estate tax is the cornerstone of a progressive system that leaves wealthy heirs with ample funds while providing the government with the resources it needs to build an environment for the common good. By preserving it, we not only restore billions in revenue to the national treasury — we also restore our most cherished collective ideals as a nation.

“Tax me” may be the least popular sentence in America, but it’s what I am asking, and I hope that our leaders are listening.

“have you or someone you know taken the drug Acutane… if so, you may be entitled to cash compensation… call 1800-bad-drug…”

So what are the tax consequences of receiving compensation for your damages?

Well, it depends… Some damages and settlement proceeds are tax exempt under IRC § 104(a)(2) while other damage awards or settlement proceeds are fully taxable.

For example, say you sued the brokerage firm that embezzled $200,000 from your account.  The brokerage firm ends up settling and agrees to compensate you $300,000.  Initially, It may appear that you have recovered your original loss of $200,000, plus an additional $100,000 for the hassle and headache of the whole ordeal.  As you can see from the illustration, your bottom line will not look so rosy.

Thus, if you receive compensation from another party by virtue of filing a lawsuit, qualifying as member of a class action, or become entitled to a payout from an existing settlement fund, ask your attorney about the tax consequences.

Here’s a further rundown of the basics, thanks to Law.com:

5 Things Every Plaintiffs Attorney Should Know About Tax Law

While tax law may seem dull and irrelevant to most attorneys’ day-to-day practice, in order to better serve their individual clients, plaintiffs attorneys should always keep the following five basic tax laws in mind, and advise their clients accordingly.

1. Attorney Fees Are Taxable
2. Awards for Personal Physical Injuries Are Exempt From Tax
3. Insurance Proceeds
4. Lump Sum or Structured Settlement Payments
5. Reporting of Awards

Give Momma one more year of jet-setting!

New York Times columnist Paul Krugman famously  dubbed the Bush 2001 tax cuts the “Throw Momma From The Train Act”, because the estate tax was eliminated for just one year—2010. But as 2010 grinds on without a federal estate levy, it’s becoming clear that Krugman got it wrong.  Any Momma who would ride the rails (even the pricey Acela) probably isn’t worth shoving to a grisly demise.  It’s the Mommas flying on their private jets who need to pack parachutes or watch their backs. Without a doubt, the one- year lapse in the federal estate is a boon to heirs of the superrich. (At  least four billionaires, including George Steinbrenner have died so far this year.)  But for ordinary families, it is creating all sorts of grief and unintended consequences and might even cost some of them extra federal tax, to say nothing of lawyers’ bills.

One set of problems relates to wills that were written assuming there would be a tax; provisions  in such documents could inadvertently disinherit children or a spouse, or could subject an estate to unnecessary state estate tax.  (For more on these issues, click here. For a map showing 2010 state estate taxes, click here.)

Another set of problems relates to a trade-off Congress made in the 2001 law: In return for eliminating the estate tax in 2010, it also did away with the full “step-up” in basis for capital assets for 2010. In other years,  the basis cost of a  decedent’s capital assets–stocks, bonds, jewelry, real estate, artwork and so on– gets adjusted to its market value at his death, or six months afterward.  (The executor gets a choice.) Conveniently, that allows heirs  to sell all the property immediately with no capital gains income taxes due. But for those dying in 2010, the step-up in assets going to non-spousal heirs is limited to $1.3 million, with another $3 million in step-up allowed for assets left to a spouse.   This means some heirs of estates worth several million could end up paying more in total federal tax than they would have had their benefactor died in 2009, when all assets got a step-up in basis and the first $3.5 million of an estate going to non-spousal heirs was exempt from estate tax. (Amounts left to a citizen-spouse aren’t subject to estate tax, since Uncle Sam figures to get his when the second spouse dies.)  These moderately well-to-do families get hit with extra capital gains taxes because their benefactor died in 2010 instead of 2009, but they don’t save much or any estate tax, compared to 2009

While an unknown number of families may pay more, a greater number of them are having to shoulder a big paperwork and administrative burden.  Assuming capital assets (including a home and stocks) total more than $1.3 million, family members and executors must locate old records showing what assets were purchased for (if such records even exist) and deal with all sorts of complicated and potentially divisive issues such as which assets, going to which heirs,  get allocated the limited basis step-ups…

Considering the complicated nuances, it might be wise to keep Momma – and her private jet – around for another year.

August 19th marked the “Cost of Government Day” for 2010.  This is the day the average American has earned enough gross income to pay off his or her share of the spending and regulatory burdens imposed by government at the federal, state, and local levels.

Sadly, working Americans toiled 231 days this year just to satisfy government imposed – 8 days later than 2009 and a full 32 days longer than 2008.

Below is a starting point for assessing your 2010 tax situation and determining whether or not consulting a tax attorney might help you reduce your bottom line this year.

Basics

Because many tax benefits are tied to or limited by adjusted gross income (AGI) — IRA deductions, for example — a key aspect of tax planning is to estimate both your 2009 and 2010 AGI. Also, when considering whether to accelerate or defer income or deductions, you should be aware of the impact this action may have on your AGI and your ability to maximize itemized deductions that are tied to AGI.

Traditional IRAs:

Individuals who are not active participants in an employer pension plan may make deductible contributions to an IRA. The annual deductible contribution limit for an IRA for 2009 is $5,000. For 2009, a $1,000 “catch-up” contribution is allowed for taxpayers age 50 or older by the close of the taxable year, making the total limit $6,000 for these individuals.

Individuals who are active participants in an employer pension plan also may make deductible contributions to an IRA, but their contributions are limited in amount depending on their AGI. For 2009, the AGI phase-out range for deductibility of IRA contributions is between $55,000 and $65,000 of modified AGI for single persons (including heads of households), and between $89,000 and $109,000 of modified AGI for married filing jointly. Above these ranges, no deduction is allowed.

Roth IRA conversions:

Regardless of income, taxpayers can convert traditional IRA accounts to Roth IRA accounts. Previously, taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income over $100,000 could not make the conversion. Also, married persons filing separate returns are now eligible to make the conversion. Note that the converted amounts are includible in income, however, for conversions taking place in 2010, a taxpayer can elect to ratably include the amount over two years in 2011 and 2012.

Lower capital gains rates:

The 15% capital gains rate (0% for taxpayers below the 15% tax bracket) will increase to 20% in 2011. Qualifying dividends taxed at reduced capital gains rates will be taxed at ordinary income rates beginning in 2011.

Lower income tax rates:

Legislation in 2001, reduced the tax rates on ordinary income through 2010.  Accordingly, these rates will likely change beginning in 2011.

2009 Tax Rates: 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 31%, and 35%

2010 Tax Rates: 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, and 35%

This is the rate at which your last dollar of income is taxed. Although tax brackets are indexed for inflation, if your income increases faster than the inflation adjustment, you may be pushed into a higher bracket. If so, your potential benefit from any tax-saving opportunity is increased (as is the cost of overlooking that opportunity).